I'm rather sick of the internet's armchair critics and non-contributing zeros. Anyone can have any opinion (and unfortunately the internet makes that too easy), few people can actually make a difference.
You'd think all the TC haters could build a thriving blog and community with their vast knowledge and experience of 'failure', but since they can't scale a simple WordPress blog with modest traffic — I'm not hopeful. It's taken over 10 minutes to load the page. Even more ironic, it's a linkbait headline with less than stellar content.
I originally thought TC was like a tabloid. Now, after thinking about it, I've come to a conclusion that there's a better analogy: it's like cable news.
The things you see on cable news (e.g., CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, etc.) are, most of the time, not really "news". They're trumped-up soundbyte stories which are "broken" at times calculated to keep eyeballs on the screen. The information reported is often wrong and corrections are rarely made. Sensationalism and reporting any controversy one can find, no matter how minor, is the order of the day. Popular stories/subjects, when discovered, are turned into repeating segments to milk them for all they're worth.
And, of course, people who rely on cable news outlets for actual news will come away fairly poorly informed on the state of the world.
But all of the above apply equally well to TC. It's just another big American infotainment outlet, working to make money off something-that-maybe-kinda-looks-like-news.
Which is why I don't read TC, and feel frustration with people who (as on this site) obsess about it and constantly link to it. Mentally, I class such people with folks in real life who want to tell me all about the latest thing they heard on Fox News.
Well said. As an example, their latest headline is complaining that the one of the Pre development wikis that was about tethering the Pre was forced to shut down. They are trashing the dev's for not getting involved in a big, ugly legal battle which they will eventually lose.
This has been a standard cat-and-mouse game in the industry for many years. Apple shuts down sites that deal with hackintoshes, MSFT shuts down sites that talk about modding the 360. Nobody likes that kind of crippling of hardware, but its not news. Usually, that development happens anyway, its just moved underground somewhere.
Anyway, the TC folks see some sort of value in reporting that the devs are weak in some way for caving in to big, expensive lawyers. It seems like when its anything involving the Pre, they trash it and the people around it like Hannity does to Obama.
Not sure about the Coding Horror hatred, although a few has implied that whatever gets posted on Coding Horror gets posted here as well, even when the article isn't particularly interesting or good.
I can't speak for everyone here not doing a startup, but for me however, Techcrunch is on average not very interesting, seems more interested in stirring up drama (at least lately) than breaking real stories, and too self-important for me to pay attention to.
I'm not sure why you would think people would need an agenda ;)
Comments
I'm rather sick of the internet's armchair critics and non-contributing zeros. Anyone can have any opinion (and unfortunately the internet makes that too easy), few people can actually make a difference.
You'd think all the TC haters could build a thriving blog and community with their vast knowledge and experience of 'failure', but since they can't scale a simple WordPress blog with modest traffic — I'm not hopeful. It's taken over 10 minutes to load the page. Even more ironic, it's a linkbait headline with less than stellar content.
I originally thought TC was like a tabloid. Now, after thinking about it, I've come to a conclusion that there's a better analogy: it's like cable news.
The things you see on cable news (e.g., CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, etc.) are, most of the time, not really "news". They're trumped-up soundbyte stories which are "broken" at times calculated to keep eyeballs on the screen. The information reported is often wrong and corrections are rarely made. Sensationalism and reporting any controversy one can find, no matter how minor, is the order of the day. Popular stories/subjects, when discovered, are turned into repeating segments to milk them for all they're worth.
And, of course, people who rely on cable news outlets for actual news will come away fairly poorly informed on the state of the world.
But all of the above apply equally well to TC. It's just another big American infotainment outlet, working to make money off something-that-maybe-kinda-looks-like-news.
Which is why I don't read TC, and feel frustration with people who (as on this site) obsess about it and constantly link to it. Mentally, I class such people with folks in real life who want to tell me all about the latest thing they heard on Fox News.
Well said. As an example, their latest headline is complaining that the one of the Pre development wikis that was about tethering the Pre was forced to shut down. They are trashing the dev's for not getting involved in a big, ugly legal battle which they will eventually lose.
This has been a standard cat-and-mouse game in the industry for many years. Apple shuts down sites that deal with hackintoshes, MSFT shuts down sites that talk about modding the 360. Nobody likes that kind of crippling of hardware, but its not news. Usually, that development happens anyway, its just moved underground somewhere.
Anyway, the TC folks see some sort of value in reporting that the devs are weak in some way for caving in to big, expensive lawyers. It seems like when its anything involving the Pre, they trash it and the people around it like Hannity does to Obama.
Yeah..the TechCrunch and Coding Horror hating is getting a little tired...I'm not sure what the agenda is...are they spurned startups?
Not sure about the Coding Horror hatred, although a few has implied that whatever gets posted on Coding Horror gets posted here as well, even when the article isn't particularly interesting or good.
I can't speak for everyone here not doing a startup, but for me however, Techcrunch is on average not very interesting, seems more interested in stirring up drama (at least lately) than breaking real stories, and too self-important for me to pay attention to.
I'm not sure why you would think people would need an agenda ;)