"This is misleading. His compensation may have been effectively $10M last year, but it's almost certainly based on a stock grant several years in the past."
You're right, or at least close enough to make my comment based on faulty assumptions.
It looks like they hired him without the "senior" title last year. I was basing my assumption on the article's statement that he made $10M "last year".
Comments
"This is misleading. His compensation may have been effectively $10M last year, but it's almost certainly based on a stock grant several years in the past."
They hired him this year.
You're right, or at least close enough to make my comment based on faulty assumptions.
It looks like they hired him without the "senior" title last year. I was basing my assumption on the article's statement that he made $10M "last year".