You realize that the majority of Engineering Phds in the US are foreign born ? - the US heavily relies on being able to attract international talent to maintain its advantage.
"Its advantage". You (not ig1) can get away with this if you're a typical HN reader but ignoring the rules of grammar is not advised for those alluded to in the article. Mistakes like that are likely to merely compound your problems.
Sadly the rather smart folk who evidently inhabit these columns (and are meticulous when instructing their computers) sometimes don't set good examples for you. They really should, should they not?
This doesn't contradict my statements, because I never denied that the US has one of the worlds best education for the top 1% which in turn makes it more desirable for foreign born students to study at MIT or Stanford.
Edit: And yes, you'll have more innovation if you can attract the brightest students, no matter in which country they happen to be born in.
Comments
You realize that the majority of Engineering Phds in the US are foreign born ? - the US heavily relies on being able to attract international talent to maintain its advantage.
"Its advantage". You (not ig1) can get away with this if you're a typical HN reader but ignoring the rules of grammar is not advised for those alluded to in the article. Mistakes like that are likely to merely compound your problems.
Sadly the rather smart folk who evidently inhabit these columns (and are meticulous when instructing their computers) sometimes don't set good examples for you. They really should, should they not?
This doesn't contradict my statements, because I never denied that the US has one of the worlds best education for the top 1% which in turn makes it more desirable for foreign born students to study at MIT or Stanford.
Edit: And yes, you'll have more innovation if you can attract the brightest students, no matter in which country they happen to be born in.