Great some competition for Docker! Which is good news for everyone (esp. Docker) Containers are the future of hosting web-apps in my opinion. They more implementations there are the better.
It's somewhat related to compete with docker but in no way to complement docker. In fact it has been recommended not to run lmctfy alongside LXC (which docker user in its core).
What about linking to the lmctfy so instead of shelling out to LXC as Docker currently does? There's a lot of promise in such an approach, should lmctfy solidify further.
Comments
Great some competition for Docker! Which is good news for everyone (esp. Docker) Containers are the future of hosting web-apps in my opinion. They more implementations there are the better.
It's not competition for docker, more a complement to it.
edit: see shykes reply: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6487080
It's somewhat related to compete with docker but in no way to complement docker. In fact it has been recommended not to run lmctfy alongside LXC (which docker user in its core).
What about linking to the lmctfy so instead of shelling out to LXC as Docker currently does? There's a lot of promise in such an approach, should lmctfy solidify further.