The parent commenter is correct: This is specific to speech, and not in general. You also have not explained how your argument invalidates President Dilma's UN speech.
(side note: you don't need to be arrogant like that to defend your point. The parent commenter was respectful in his/her response)
Comments
Wrong AGAIN.... Please read the CONSTITUTION[1]
A.G.A.I.N Constitution
In portuguese: "IV - é livre a manifestação do pensamento, sendo vedado o anonimato; "
Translation : - Freedom of speech but anonymity is vetted
[1] = http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituic...
--Edited to do not appear arrogant --
The anonymity concept is one of pillars of privacy and democracy there are several articles about that but this sums up well [1]
So before our 'leader' bashes US to get some popularity votes can we fix our house first?
[1[https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/right-anonymity-matter...
The parent commenter is correct: This is specific to speech, and not in general. You also have not explained how your argument invalidates President Dilma's UN speech.
(side note: you don't need to be arrogant like that to defend your point. The parent commenter was respectful in his/her response)