Why is this even significant? The OP's logic makes no sense. He claims that gold isn't for mindless fanboys who want the new thing because it's new, but then claims that gold is for mindless fanboys who want the new thing because it's shiny and gold instead.
Comments
Why is this even significant? The OP's logic makes no sense. He claims that gold isn't for mindless fanboys who want the new thing because it's new, but then claims that gold is for mindless fanboys who want the new thing because it's shiny and gold instead.
What the hell?
If you assume that fashion is mindless, then sure, he kinda said something like that.