There is a very high chance that a professional will end up finding a job through linkedin since employers, specifically recruiters find it helpful to filter prospective employees... but keeping in context an older post [1], is linkedin really worth the solution to find the right person for the job? Had it not existed, would we end up hiring the wrong people? I guess not. It is just an added layer of `sophistication` to the hiring process.
Its features don't really acknowledge an individual’s skill set, and are flawed. For example the `endorsing feature` of linkedin allows people who haven't even worked with technology X, to endorse people for the same technology.
In short, I don't see linkedin adds any value, but at the same time since recruiters are on it and we are forced to accept it.
You're talking about the "skills" section. I don't need to work with jQuery directly to know John Smith wrote my company's jQuery code and he has that skill. If you want to write an in-depth review of John Smith's code from a technical standpoint, you can do that on LinkedIn, too. Most often, LinkedIn asks me if they know XYZ and either I know that they know it or I don't know--the value I get from that, it helps me to see where my connections are going with their careers. That's helpful to know for a variety of reasons, use your imagination. Sometimes they go into "skill" areas I never would have expected. Likewise, if someone hates Java (even if they know it well) they're not going to list it as a skill. Also, you can turn off any profile section you find annoying, it's in the options/settings. For example, I have the "people who viewed PJ also viewed these profiles" turned off.
Comments
There is a very high chance that a professional will end up finding a job through linkedin since employers, specifically recruiters find it helpful to filter prospective employees... but keeping in context an older post [1], is linkedin really worth the solution to find the right person for the job? Had it not existed, would we end up hiring the wrong people? I guess not. It is just an added layer of `sophistication` to the hiring process.
Its features don't really acknowledge an individual’s skill set, and are flawed. For example the `endorsing feature` of linkedin allows people who haven't even worked with technology X, to endorse people for the same technology.
In short, I don't see linkedin adds any value, but at the same time since recruiters are on it and we are forced to accept it.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6212961
You're talking about the "skills" section. I don't need to work with jQuery directly to know John Smith wrote my company's jQuery code and he has that skill. If you want to write an in-depth review of John Smith's code from a technical standpoint, you can do that on LinkedIn, too. Most often, LinkedIn asks me if they know XYZ and either I know that they know it or I don't know--the value I get from that, it helps me to see where my connections are going with their careers. That's helpful to know for a variety of reasons, use your imagination. Sometimes they go into "skill" areas I never would have expected. Likewise, if someone hates Java (even if they know it well) they're not going to list it as a skill. Also, you can turn off any profile section you find annoying, it's in the options/settings. For example, I have the "people who viewed PJ also viewed these profiles" turned off.