Skip to content

Comment on "Forensics for Prosecutors" mentions backdoor in TrueCrypt (page 15) [pdf]

Comments

Are we all just going to take this seriously? It's pretty obviously a fake. Just look at the names at the end. Detective Laughlin Foo? Stu Pitt? Neither of which, incidentally, return anything in google aside from this presentation. There's also a clear divergence in style on the backdoor slides, and it reads like a parody.

But the most obvious problem: if the NSA or whoever had a backdoor to truecrypt and Android and iOS, they would not send that information to a local DA office to be leaked.

Please don't set aside critical thinking just because something confirms your biases.

Incessantly cynical distrust of the government is the new blind patriotism.

It is impossible to overmistrust the State. If you could imagine the lows they will go to, you'd be working for them by now.

Is it really impossible? Do you think there is literally really no limit to what they can do or what they will do?

No, but they operate at a scale beyond our comprehension, and use reasoning beyond our comprehension (or mine, anyway!), so it's not too clever to imagine that we can anticipate their limits...

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.