Comment on "Forensics for Prosecutors" mentions backdoor in TrueCrypt (page 15) [pdf]parentComments−na8513yScroll down a bit; all they have to disclose is that the files "were forensically obtained."−andrewpi13yI saw that, but I still don't see how that works in a trial. Said evidence will need to be introduced in court. When the witness tries to be cute by giving a vague answer, can't the defense just ask the witness to explain further?−DannyBee13yThis is entirely false. For gods sake, you have to put lab technicians on the stand for cross examination when they test your blood.For something like this, a report gets written, and the person who wrote it gets cross examined.
Comments
Scroll down a bit; all they have to disclose is that the files "were forensically obtained."
I saw that, but I still don't see how that works in a trial. Said evidence will need to be introduced in court. When the witness tries to be cute by giving a vague answer, can't the defense just ask the witness to explain further?
This is entirely false. For gods sake, you have to put lab technicians on the stand for cross examination when they test your blood.
For something like this, a report gets written, and the person who wrote it gets cross examined.