Skip to content

Comment on Starting a business isn't as crazy and risky as they say

Comments

I like looking at the "risk" of buying a new car vs. starting a business. When one buys a new car, they may spend $35,000 and as soon as they drive it off the lot, the value rapidly drops. When you talk to the average salaryman, they never say "buying a car is risky" when in fact, its one of the dumbest financial risks that one can take.

When starting a business, that same $35,000 investment actually has a chance of increasing in value, even if 95% of businesses fail.

Most people who say business is "risky" are just not comfortable with ambiguity. Buying a car is very well-known. Building a product that has never been built before means that you're venturing into the unknown, a very scary proposition for most people.

You don't invest in a car, like you invest in a business. You buy it for it's utility value, like you buy a gallon of milk.

If you buy a car for its utility value, you can get a perfectly usable car for $10,000-$15,000. Say you spend that $15,000 on the car, you still have $20,000 left over that you could invest in a business.

But what if investing in a business isn't a priority, but a flashy new car is?

Utility value isn't a one-off constant, it depends on the user.

You completely missed the point; this thread is about people who say "starting a business is risky". If you measure risk in terms of ROI in dollars: purchasing a deprecating asset vs. starting a business is a no-brainer, yet most "average joes" that tell you "starting a business is risky" won't think twice about blowing lots of money on a brand new car.

you are not taking "opportunity cost" into account....

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.