Skip to content

Comment on If I can't see your work - you're crapparent

Comments

I have no way of distinguishing a genuinely talented developer from a bullshitter.

Nonsense. Put him in front of a computer and ask him to write something. Then evaluate him based on that.

I have written hundreds of thousands of lines of code, but only have a few thousand up on Github and quite frankly, most of that is not my best work. Most of the code I write is proprietary.

Why should I spend half a day or more interviewing a candidate who can present no real evidence that they can actually code, when I can have my pick of people whose Github profiles are overflowing with quality commits?

Pretty simple. Those with overflowing commits on Github either have a very skewed work/life balance or quite simply, have no actual work experience. Open source only pays the bills in very rare circumstances.

Those with overflowing commits on Github either have a very skewed work/life balance or quite simply, have no actual work experience.

This. I would LOVE to contribute to open source. But I also want a life. I want the life more than I want to contribute. So until I can contribute while I'm on the job, my github account will languish. And that's fine by me.

My last interview asked me about my github account, and I told him just that, that I'd love to contribute, but just don't have the time. I still got the job.

It's not a problem until you make it a problem.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.