Let's take that premise to OCR then. This whole debacle started with JBIG2 settings that I guess duplicated(?) one section and inserted it where similar text exists. Only it was marginally similar.
According to Adam (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6156418) this is a known problem that Xerox, who call themselves document people for crying out loud, should have known and compensated for.
Comments
Let's take that premise to OCR then. This whole debacle started with JBIG2 settings that I guess duplicated(?) one section and inserted it where similar text exists. Only it was marginally similar.
According to Adam (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6156418) this is a known problem that Xerox, who call themselves document people for crying out loud, should have known and compensated for.