Comment on Cheating to Learn: How a UCLA professor gamed a game theory midtermparentComments−brownbat13y2/3 of them were the same score or betterOr, if you like, 2/3 of them were the same score or worse.−cupcake-unicorn13yHaha, true. But I still think the result was telling, especially that a "loner" beat the group score.−JayEnn13yWhat was his game though? To make the overall class grade better. To prove that a "lone wolf" is worse than the "mob"? The outcome from an educational view seems to be that everyone won. The loner could be a statistical outlier.
Comments
Or, if you like, 2/3 of them were the same score or worse.
Haha, true. But I still think the result was telling, especially that a "loner" beat the group score.
What was his game though? To make the overall class grade better. To prove that a "lone wolf" is worse than the "mob"? The outcome from an educational view seems to be that everyone won. The loner could be a statistical outlier.