Yes, it's lacking "rigorous" work. It's a G+ post, which is almost by definition not "rigorous." Sheesh. Would you like a refund on your subscription fees?
Thanks, but I'm not subscribed. Actually, I wouldn't mind if it was not making HN home.
And yes, I think with your reputation, you're expected not to have weak public opinion. That's a responsibility which come with social weight, sorry about that (and to be clear : I'm ok with you having unsourced opinions, just not when it implies influencing people).
Comments
Yes, it's lacking "rigorous" work. It's a G+ post, which is almost by definition not "rigorous." Sheesh. Would you like a refund on your subscription fees?
Thanks, but I'm not subscribed. Actually, I wouldn't mind if it was not making HN home.
And yes, I think with your reputation, you're expected not to have weak public opinion. That's a responsibility which come with social weight, sorry about that (and to be clear : I'm ok with you having unsourced opinions, just not when it implies influencing people).
Um, Google+ doesn't have subscription fees. It was a joke.
But it has subscription via circles. It was disarming the joke.