You say that as if I was conspiratorially doubting the fact that you are working on another story.
Poor diversion from M.L. Hunt's point that as a professional journalist you should certainly recognize that there is nothing in your rhetoric that somehow undermines the original claims of an internet search possibly triggering a police visit. You are just fanning the smoke into another direction, for what purpose I don't know. As you mentioned already, shouldn't you be writing another article instead of spending time posting and responding to comments on a story you have absolutely no relevant information about?
Comments
You say that as if I was conspiratorially doubting the fact that you are working on another story.
Poor diversion from M.L. Hunt's point that as a professional journalist you should certainly recognize that there is nothing in your rhetoric that somehow undermines the original claims of an internet search possibly triggering a police visit. You are just fanning the smoke into another direction, for what purpose I don't know. As you mentioned already, shouldn't you be writing another article instead of spending time posting and responding to comments on a story you have absolutely no relevant information about?
If you don't think the Facebook post was relevant, I feel sorry for you.
But you're right, I should be writing the other article.
And that article is published and is being discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6149393