I believe you're saying that the company should exist primarily for the benefit of the employees' health coverage, and secondarily as an entity that takes money and makes something of value.

I might be mistaken though. If you are, is that out of a sense of fairness or sympathy to those who have lost benefits? Are they somehow more deserving of our action than the person who put their life's savings into bonds in a company? ie, is this just an appeal based on current emotion -- how bad it makes you feel about those employees?