Really? For example, the 15th amendment of the US constitution doesn't apply to non-citizens (voting rights).
The US actually does a pretty good job of protecting non-citizens. Unless there is evidence that providing a right to a non-citizen is required for the proper functioning of the country, it has to be provided.
Comments
Really? For example, the 15th amendment of the US constitution doesn't apply to non-citizens (voting rights).
The US actually does a pretty good job of protecting non-citizens. Unless there is evidence that providing a right to a non-citizen is required for the proper functioning of the country, it has to be provided.
I can understand why voting rights would be limited to citizens, but protection against government abuse shouldn't be.