Comment on Rewarding Edward Snowden's CourageparentComments−u232813yReally, terrorism? How has he inflict any physical damage on anyone? Agree or disagree with his actions, it's clearly not terrorism. I look down in disgust on anybody that frames his actions in that light.−tlrobinson13yI doubt the OP was calling him a terrorist, just saying (perhaps jokingly) that it's possible that's how the government will try to portray him.Did you see the article titled "How three pacifists were convicted as terrorists" currently on the front page of HN? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5848148−u232813yMy statement stands. If he/she was being tongue-in-cheek, then it doesn't apply. If it's the powers-that-be that do it, well, there you are.−dale38613yYes, that's exactly what I was going for.−u232813yWell, my apologies if I insulted you personally. It was meant to be an attack on the notation that this can be framed as 'terrorism'.−riggins13yReally, terrorism?exactly. people are making unsupportable claims.
Comments
Really, terrorism? How has he inflict any physical damage on anyone? Agree or disagree with his actions, it's clearly not terrorism. I look down in disgust on anybody that frames his actions in that light.
I doubt the OP was calling him a terrorist, just saying (perhaps jokingly) that it's possible that's how the government will try to portray him.
Did you see the article titled "How three pacifists were convicted as terrorists" currently on the front page of HN? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5848148
My statement stands. If he/she was being tongue-in-cheek, then it doesn't apply. If it's the powers-that-be that do it, well, there you are.
Yes, that's exactly what I was going for.
Well, my apologies if I insulted you personally. It was meant to be an attack on the notation that this can be framed as 'terrorism'.
Really, terrorism?
exactly. people are making unsupportable claims.