In fact, the symbols that form the syntax, doesn't matter at
all: standard symbol set:
~ # access, forward (standard)
object ~ property
-> # access, backward ("homosexual" call if you will)
method -> object
->> # access, backward high ("homosexual" call with higher precedence than ~ and ->... very gay...)
some ~ linkage ~ method ->> object
<- # backcall semantics, normal precedence, "tailored" calling
"eenie", "meeenie", "minie", "moe" <- count toes:
take: basket: "apples", "oranges", "bananas" <<- fill basket:
# take(basket().fill_basket("apples",...), ...)
# BE CAREFUL with that code above
# basket doesn't get created with the fruits, just empty basket which
# is subsequently filled with goodies
All these operators can be a different set, but these glyphs are the best in my opinion
~
# PS: PLEASE do NOT get offended by my characterization
Comments
In fact, the symbols that form the syntax, doesn't matter at
all: standard symbol set:
All these operators can be a different set, but these glyphs are the best in my opinion~ # PS: PLEASE do NOT get offended by my characterization
# of certain method calls as "homosexual"
#
# Don't! This is just for laughs at the language
# I am not against gay community in any way
# and "homosexual" calls are actually the most
# useful feature of this language
#
# Thank you.