Skip to content

Comment on Luxury or Necessity? The Public Makes a U-Turn

Comments

Slightly off topic, but related none-the-less: something that has always bothered me about "necessities" is that 99% of US households have a TV [1] but at the same time, ~12% are in poverty. [2] How do "necessities" like this tie into poverty?

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_in_the_United_States [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States

Spending priorities don't just stop with TV (which is probably the least offender since they can be relatively cheap).

I could drive around neighborhoods in Detroit (as far back as pre-2000) and see a lot of people with houses that were falling apart from disrepair, but they have a decked-out car with gold rims and hydraulics in the driveway... Or the ricers that can only afford a Ford Escort, but add some huge spoiler to it... People spending mounds of money on things that don't matter that much isn't something new.

In America, you are poor if you only have one TV.

(The statistic you point out has bothered me for a long time, but it's hard to control people's spending priorities, and it's not like these people are buying new flatscreens with welfare checks. You can drive around any college town during May or August and pick up a working TV for free off the curb.)

>it's not like these people are buying new flatscreens with welfare checks

this is a very good point. I wonder if there is data around that examines how welfare checks are spent.

What do you mean by "welfare". Food stamps are accepted at certain locations for certain items. Unemployment insurance is a general check - but that isn't exactly welfare.

I meant welfare to mean cash payments to the poor as provided for in the Welfare Reform act of 1996. [1]

You brought up a good point to differentiate this from food stamps and unemployment.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare_Reform_Act_of_1996

Read the book Bowling Alone.

If you are poor, TV is probably the only entertainment you can afford. America has lost or greatly diminished almost all its local communities. A poor person without television would need a lot of other local poor people without televisions to start recreating a community where people do things with each other.

(Nobody say "library". I love libraries, but in low-income neighborhoods they're usually less common and less well-stocked. If you can even afford to get there and back.)

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.