I believe "argue" was implicitly defined as "sue the aforementioned parties" (as it would more obviously be if he hadn't included himself in the list.) I have "views", too, but they're nothing objective enough (thus the name "views", implying that no two people can share exactly the same one without overlapping one-another in space) that I would care to defend them in a court of law.
Comments
"These are my views. They do not reflect the views of my clients, my colleagues, my friends, my family, my company or, if you want to argue, me."
Way to stick to your guns. I stopped reading right there. (Emphasis is mine.)
I believe "argue" was implicitly defined as "sue the aforementioned parties" (as it would more obviously be if he hadn't included himself in the list.) I have "views", too, but they're nothing objective enough (thus the name "views", implying that no two people can share exactly the same one without overlapping one-another in space) that I would care to defend them in a court of law.
That makes more sense.