Yes but the majority or people just use the top stories sort and are happy with it. I think people who want everything in chronological order are the type of people who don't want to miss a post - even though most posts on Facebook/Google + aren't important enough to matter if you miss them.
Actually I suspect a not insignificant number of people aren't even aware of Facebook's edge-rank shenanigans. I have lost count of the number of times I have had to point out, even to techy friends, that you can reset the sort to most recent (over and over, thanks Facebook). This normally comes after people complaining they didn't see some post or another from a friend/family member, because Facebook decided it wasn't "popular" enough. Then again most of my friends are the kind that only friend actual friends, if they had feeds 800 people deep I suspect Facebook culling most posts would be appreciated. The only thing that annoys me is constantly having to reset it, you'd think after N times they would take the signal of "your edge-rank trimming is abysmal", but no.
I want things in chronological order so I can tell if I have missed any post. But that doesn't mean I need to read every post. I do want to be able to decide for myself from the list what I view as a "top story". So I have them sort by date. and when I've scrolled back to something I know I've seen then I don't need to keep scrolling back. When things are random, I get stuff I've already seen mixed in with new stuff. That is not a very good user experience IMO.
This behavior baffles me. It happens often that someone will share a G+ post directly with me, so I'll receive an email and G+ notification thinger in the upper-right of Google pages. Then I'll visit <plus.google.com> and the post is nowhere to be found.
Sorry if I misunderstood, but I made a statement about the large body of users and you replied with a personal anecdote. I realize there are exceptions, but my point (in response to the parent comment) was that clearly most users aren't bothered by a non-chronological presentation. Even Twitter seems to be moving away from that.
Comments
Mine is. They do reset the sort order back to "top stories" once in awhile which is annoying but I always just set it back to sort by date
Yes but the majority or people just use the top stories sort and are happy with it. I think people who want everything in chronological order are the type of people who don't want to miss a post - even though most posts on Facebook/Google + aren't important enough to matter if you miss them.
Actually I suspect a not insignificant number of people aren't even aware of Facebook's edge-rank shenanigans. I have lost count of the number of times I have had to point out, even to techy friends, that you can reset the sort to most recent (over and over, thanks Facebook). This normally comes after people complaining they didn't see some post or another from a friend/family member, because Facebook decided it wasn't "popular" enough. Then again most of my friends are the kind that only friend actual friends, if they had feeds 800 people deep I suspect Facebook culling most posts would be appreciated. The only thing that annoys me is constantly having to reset it, you'd think after N times they would take the signal of "your edge-rank trimming is abysmal", but no.
I want things in chronological order so I can tell if I have missed any post. But that doesn't mean I need to read every post. I do want to be able to decide for myself from the list what I view as a "top story". So I have them sort by date. and when I've scrolled back to something I know I've seen then I don't need to keep scrolling back. When things are random, I get stuff I've already seen mixed in with new stuff. That is not a very good user experience IMO.
This behavior baffles me. It happens often that someone will share a G+ post directly with me, so I'll receive an email and G+ notification thinger in the upper-right of Google pages. Then I'll visit <plus.google.com> and the post is nowhere to be found.
Don't take a sample size of one and extrapolate to everyone.
I did no such thing. I said mine is. Don't put words in my mouth, please.
Sorry if I misunderstood, but I made a statement about the large body of users and you replied with a personal anecdote. I realize there are exceptions, but my point (in response to the parent comment) was that clearly most users aren't bothered by a non-chronological presentation. Even Twitter seems to be moving away from that.