Skip to content

Comment on Daily happiness averages using Twitter

Comments

I'm not that surprised by the low score of 5/2/11, because double negatives are hard. It's actually hard to separate sentiment when interactions (such as double negatives) come up:

"A bomb killed a terrorist." Good news. Three negative words.

Many psychologists believe that the quickest parts of the human brain don't process double negatives at all-- that's why thinking "this is not going to kill me" doesn't help during a panic attack, but "this will end" does-- which is probably a small part of why news-watching (even positive news like Osama's death) makes people unhappy.

"My best friend has been killed by a heart attack." Three positive words. One negative. One (attack) that is slightly-negative but has energetic/positive connotations.

"My best friend defeated cancer" vs. "Cancer defeated my best friend." Similar tokens; opposite meanings.

What really surprises me is that it seems contrary to economic trends: in late 2008, when the economy was going to hell, the sentiment average goes up in a major way. Across 2009-13, while the economy slowly recovers, the sentiment level declines. Day-of-week average differences are very slight, but the more people are working, the more unhappy they are. This could mean that structurally unemployed people are self-deceptive, or tweet happier things because they have more time per tweet, or it could genuinely mean something.

His research specifically mentions the classification of n-grams as a future area of work. (I have been working on implementing his work in python, so I have been diving into this over the past few weeks.)

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.