That said, if there are things in the article you disagree with, why not spell them out and offer your alternative take, instead of just saying "it's offensive for one person to ..."
Disagreeing with an article and having a well reasoned position on why you disagree should be fine. But generic negative comments without much "meat" to them don't seem as valuable.
Comments
FWIW, I did not downvote you.
That said, if there are things in the article you disagree with, why not spell them out and offer your alternative take, instead of just saying "it's offensive for one person to ..."
Disagreeing with an article and having a well reasoned position on why you disagree should be fine. But generic negative comments without much "meat" to them don't seem as valuable.