rather than "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" (which is what is needed for a criminal conviction) and definitely is at a level such that sometimes places are searched or items are seized that never end up resulting in a criminal prosecution. The case mentioned in this thread involved a search warrant affidavit mentioning facts that made reasonable a belief that the items seized should be looked at as possibly related to a crime.
Comments
"That's not the correct standard of evidence for the allegations supporting a search warrant."
It would be great if you could explain (to us non lawyers) what did constitute a correct standard of evidence.
The search warrant standard is called "probable cause"
http://www.criminal-law-lawyer-source.com/terms/probable-cau...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause
rather than "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" (which is what is needed for a criminal conviction) and definitely is at a level such that sometimes places are searched or items are seized that never end up resulting in a criminal prosecution. The case mentioned in this thread involved a search warrant affidavit mentioning facts that made reasonable a belief that the items seized should be looked at as possibly related to a crime.