What's really interesting here is not that a $1199 Macbook Pro outperformed a bunch of sub-$1000 PC laptops, but that the $429 Acer outperformed the rest of them, including the $2199 Macbook Pro.
The Retina screens are probably going to get lower scores due to the way Windows handles them. It'd be nice if they give a more detailed breakdown of how those seemingly random numbers were calculated.
Comments
What's really interesting here is not that a $1199 Macbook Pro outperformed a bunch of sub-$1000 PC laptops, but that the $429 Acer outperformed the rest of them, including the $2199 Macbook Pro.
The benchmark here is crazy subjective.
The Retina screens are probably going to get lower scores due to the way Windows handles them. It'd be nice if they give a more detailed breakdown of how those seemingly random numbers were calculated.