And before you say, "Get real, men are almost never victimized by sexual harassment in today's world"
I wouldn't say that. At all.
But I would say, and seriously with respect, that your writing on the subject seems curiously ignorant of the feminist demands, support, defenses of Title IX.
And though I would not say men are not harassed by sexual harassment, regardless, the statistics, all the evidence is that these sexual harassment star chambers are overwhelmingly targeting men.
Would you agree though, that women, historically, have been the greater share of sexual harassment and assault victims between the two genders? If so, then to call these reforms the machinations of overbearing feminists would to, some degree, be stating the obvious...because, it is not a surprise that the group most concerned with women being disenfranchised as victims here would be women, and that those women would also be feminists.
Now to argue that this attempted reform has become corrupted by overbearing feminists, then I ask: to what end? The motive is not clear and I think the simpler explanation is that sexual harassment and assault is by its very nature hard to investigate and adjudicate, and that these difficulties alone can cause the school's disciplinary system to go awry. Or are you arguing that in cases of sexual harassment between males (such as a homophobic attack or male on male rape), that things go just fine for all parties involved because no feminists are there to exert undue forces on the proceedings?
No, I am saying you seem ignorant of the history -- of the many many feminists groups demanding that no rape go unpunished, demanding that the public believe there is no such thing as a false rape allegation, demanding that all rape allegations be believed, demanding that law enforcement take on predominant aggressor policies (that are necessarily biased towards women), and telling us all that innocent until proven guilty as well as Blackstone's ratio should be put aside for rape allegations and rape prosecutions.
You make your points in this vacuum, seemingly ignorant of 40 years of bogus feminist statistics, anti-democratic feminist behavior.
Comments
And before you say, "Get real, men are almost never victimized by sexual harassment in today's world"
I wouldn't say that. At all.
But I would say, and seriously with respect, that your writing on the subject seems curiously ignorant of the feminist demands, support, defenses of Title IX.
And though I would not say men are not harassed by sexual harassment, regardless, the statistics, all the evidence is that these sexual harassment star chambers are overwhelmingly targeting men.
Would you agree though, that women, historically, have been the greater share of sexual harassment and assault victims between the two genders? If so, then to call these reforms the machinations of overbearing feminists would to, some degree, be stating the obvious...because, it is not a surprise that the group most concerned with women being disenfranchised as victims here would be women, and that those women would also be feminists.
Now to argue that this attempted reform has become corrupted by overbearing feminists, then I ask: to what end? The motive is not clear and I think the simpler explanation is that sexual harassment and assault is by its very nature hard to investigate and adjudicate, and that these difficulties alone can cause the school's disciplinary system to go awry. Or are you arguing that in cases of sexual harassment between males (such as a homophobic attack or male on male rape), that things go just fine for all parties involved because no feminists are there to exert undue forces on the proceedings?
No, I am saying you seem ignorant of the history -- of the many many feminists groups demanding that no rape go unpunished, demanding that the public believe there is no such thing as a false rape allegation, demanding that all rape allegations be believed, demanding that law enforcement take on predominant aggressor policies (that are necessarily biased towards women), and telling us all that innocent until proven guilty as well as Blackstone's ratio should be put aside for rape allegations and rape prosecutions.
You make your points in this vacuum, seemingly ignorant of 40 years of bogus feminist statistics, anti-democratic feminist behavior.