Comment on Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google ReaderparentComments−ludwigvan13yI guess it is the service (unofficial api) it provided (syncing bt. multiple devices) as opposed to the website itself.−jdechko13yExactly, the web UI was mediocre at best, and went downhill the more they tied it to G+. But as a RSS syncing platform it was/is great.
Comments
I guess it is the service (unofficial api) it provided (syncing bt. multiple devices) as opposed to the website itself.
Exactly, the web UI was mediocre at best, and went downhill the more they tied it to G+. But as a RSS syncing platform it was/is great.