Because both Samsung and Apple are hardware companies making a physical product with a price from which they aim to make profit for their shareholders. Essentially they have the similar aims therefore using that aim as a measure seems reasonable.
Linux and Windows and those involved in producing and marketing them on the other hand have different aims and different business models. The reason it's not right to say MS "wins" in the server market based on profit is that Linux isn't trying to compete on profit, it has other aims (which are as varied as those who develop and promote it).
If he'd said Apple and Google it might have been a fair comparison, but while their execution is different (and while in some ways they complete quite indirectly and it's not a zero sum game, even without the other competitors) Samsung and Apple do have broadly similar goals.
Comments
Because both Samsung and Apple are hardware companies making a physical product with a price from which they aim to make profit for their shareholders. Essentially they have the similar aims therefore using that aim as a measure seems reasonable.
Linux and Windows and those involved in producing and marketing them on the other hand have different aims and different business models. The reason it's not right to say MS "wins" in the server market based on profit is that Linux isn't trying to compete on profit, it has other aims (which are as varied as those who develop and promote it).
If he'd said Apple and Google it might have been a fair comparison, but while their execution is different (and while in some ways they complete quite indirectly and it's not a zero sum game, even without the other competitors) Samsung and Apple do have broadly similar goals.