Skip to content

Comment on .NET MVC vs Ruby on Rails. Ding

Comments

It's a decent comparison, but now that MVC has a full release, the documentation has gotten significantly better. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd394709.aspx

I will disagree about ORM- there are already plenty of ORM and ORM-like frameworks out there for .NET, and I don't think the MVC team wanted to add another one.

Not sure about the routing being verbose. I'm (hopefully) close to finishing up a fairly complicated app with the framework, and routing hasn't been a problem for me.

I will definitely agree with point 12 though, but that's because the WebForms model causes brain damage if you use it for too long.

Actually... it sharpens your mind since it's much more complicated :)

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.