This is great tool and nice article. The only slightly additional requirement for this tool is you know the name of the file being sent. I actually was thinking of making this optional (for the same reasons they require it, to allow many different files).
I've added a link for udpcast to my readme as an alternative. Thanks!
There's also UFTP, it doesn't require the receiver to know the file name. (But it is different from your implementation in a number of ways, most importantly it transfers all data via UDP.)
Comments
This is great tool and nice article. The only slightly additional requirement for this tool is you know the name of the file being sent. I actually was thinking of making this optional (for the same reasons they require it, to allow many different files).
I've added a link for udpcast to my readme as an alternative. Thanks!
There's also UFTP, it doesn't require the receiver to know the file name. (But it is different from your implementation in a number of ways, most importantly it transfers all data via UDP.)
http://www.tcnj.edu/~bush/uftp.html
And it's multicast, which saves a lot of bandwidth and makes it faster :-)