I just thought it was funny the article took a shortcut on speed testing because only 96 values were possible from the function. At that point, we are no longer talking about math or math error, we are talking a simple array lookup.
I get the "less math" part of the article, but it just seemed a bit confused.
Comments
and only perform any optimizations at all after you have proved its a bottleneck for your application (unlikely) :p
I just thought it was funny the article took a shortcut on speed testing because only 96 values were possible from the function. At that point, we are no longer talking about math or math error, we are talking a simple array lookup.
I get the "less math" part of the article, but it just seemed a bit confused.