Pretty soon, half of all voters won't be paying a dime to fund the spending programs they vote for. That sounds dangerous.
In Singapore, which has a large number of social programs, many programs have a copay to counter the "buffet mentality" that comes from handing out lots of free goods. Consumption is subsidized, but it is not free. I'd like to see us take a similar approach.
Comments
Pretty soon, half of all voters won't be paying a dime to fund the spending programs they vote for. That sounds dangerous.
In Singapore, which has a large number of social programs, many programs have a copay to counter the "buffet mentality" that comes from handing out lots of free goods. Consumption is subsidized, but it is not free. I'd like to see us take a similar approach.