He says Hollywood keeps making sequels even though they turn out to be bad. But does he show that Hollywood loses money making bad sequels?
IF bad inevitably translated to unprofitable, Hollywood would have a strong incentive to make good movies. If movie goers flock to movies that are just a mediocre mishmash of the themes they've seen before, then Hollywood has every reason to keep putting them out.
Comments
Are crappy products unprofitable?
He says Hollywood keeps making sequels even though they turn out to be bad. But does he show that Hollywood loses money making bad sequels?
IF bad inevitably translated to unprofitable, Hollywood would have a strong incentive to make good movies. If movie goers flock to movies that are just a mediocre mishmash of the themes they've seen before, then Hollywood has every reason to keep putting them out.