Every "experienced software developer with expertise across multiple programming languages and technologies" in 2025:
Currently, I'm on sabbatical (micro retirement) and pondering full retirement. The IT industry has undergone significant upheavals in recent years ... the rapid advancement of AI technologies has created new challenges for experienced developers seeking meaningful work opportunities.
In 2026:
The cheaper cousin. Everything above retained a duration. Sometimes the answer is just a number, and the Counter collector counts operations as they begin and keeps nothing else, which makes it cheap enough to leave running under a whole test suite. Bind a database layer's execute once, register a counter, and give every test a query budget in a fixture, and the classic N+1 regression fails with a number attached rather than slipping through as a test that merely got slower.
How do people not see this? I don’t know if this is a useful library, probably it is. The author is legitimate and accomplished. But it’s hard to disregard that they’re willing to paste barely readable unedited LLM output on their website under their name. Or rather, maybe that they’ve spent so much time talking to Claude that they’ve been warped into thinking this is something approximating normal English for communicating with humans.
Comments
Every "experienced software developer with expertise across multiple programming languages and technologies" in 2025:
Currently, I'm on sabbatical (micro retirement) and pondering full retirement. The IT industry has undergone significant upheavals in recent years ... the rapid advancement of AI technologies has created new challenges for experienced developers seeking meaningful work opportunities.
In 2026:
The cheaper cousin. Everything above retained a duration. Sometimes the answer is just a number, and the Counter collector counts operations as they begin and keeps nothing else, which makes it cheap enough to leave running under a whole test suite. Bind a database layer's execute once, register a counter, and give every test a query budget in a fixture, and the classic N+1 regression fails with a number attached rather than slipping through as a test that merely got slower.
How do people not see this? I don’t know if this is a useful library, probably it is. The author is legitimate and accomplished. But it’s hard to disregard that they’re willing to paste barely readable unedited LLM output on their website under their name. Or rather, maybe that they’ve spent so much time talking to Claude that they’ve been warped into thinking this is something approximating normal English for communicating with humans.
I read this first and I thought the second example was random words you made up. Nope.
lmao. Yep. I guess they all took a sabbatical and decided F** it, lobotomize me, I'm all in.