Skip to content

Comment on Txt: A fast, keyboard-driven terminal text editor for engineers

Comments

The editors that live in the terminal either have steep learning curves built around modal paradigms, or they are too limited to be genuinely useful.
txt is not trying to replace your main IDE. It is the editor you reach for when you just need to edit something

These two are in conflict. If you just want to edit something, and don’t know [n]vi[m] or emacs, then use nano. If you want line numbers, code folding, syntax highlighting, etc. then it sounds like you should spend the time to learn a more powerful editor.

Honestly, vi isn’t that hard to learn the absolute basics, and you should spend the 15 minutes to do so, because it’s practically guaranteed to be available everywhere. :wq and i are about all you need to “just edit something.”

I honestly don't get software engineers who don't know basic vim motions and don't even care to learn them. Seriously? They plan never to use `less` and `more`, they won't be reading manpages, they are okay with not knowing what `sed` can do?

I get why people prefer not to use it actively - everyone has their own preference, but choosing to not to know it, at all? Knowing basics of vim for a programmer is like understanding basics of git. It is a must.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.