Hi, I wrote that note by hand; I didn't use Claude. The hypotheses were based on the fact that other emulations used different paths to reach the playback device. For example, I analyzed Rockbox to see how they managed to play music on this chip. I did use Claude and Gemini to investigate and create the emulator code
I think one of us missed the sarcasm. Lots of people post compiled binaries to git, so you can't really use that as a "you shouldn't forget to mention LLM use because you shouldn't submit compiled binaries" because lots of people do it in order to use it as a distribution channel rather than requiring users to compile it themselves or requiring the author(s) to host the binaries elsewhere.
Comments
If you're going to paste raw claude output, please at least replace "I" with "Claude".
Hi, I wrote that note by hand; I didn't use Claude. The hypotheses were based on the fact that other emulations used different paths to reach the playback device. For example, I analyzed Rockbox to see how they managed to play music on this chip. I did use Claude and Gemini to investigate and create the emulator code
But that was the single hardest claim in the model register!
I, Claudius
Really sounds like: If you’re going to paste raw executable binaries, please at least replace “I” with “the compiler”
More like, don't commit compiled executables to git.
Right, because no one does that.
Hence the equivalence.
I think one of us missed the sarcasm. Lots of people post compiled binaries to git, so you can't really use that as a "you shouldn't forget to mention LLM use because you shouldn't submit compiled binaries" because lots of people do it in order to use it as a distribution channel rather than requiring users to compile it themselves or requiring the author(s) to host the binaries elsewhere.
Lots of people paste LLM output into human discussion forums.
Or "if you're going to submit a comment, credit Tim Berners-Lee".