Franklin was pretty specific, it was a good enough Constitution "for now" with a rickety set of checks and balances that'd do for a while .. until a Despot showed up.
He was thinking of "the people" having an ongoing scrutiny and active control to prevent any such slide .. rather than sitting about on their arses, not voting and counting on using guns if it got too bad.
Comments
[flagged]
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.
You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly, and we've asked you before.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Which people?
Because the responsibility lies in the founding fathers thinking that electing kings with little to no checks was a good idea.
Franklin was pretty specific, it was a good enough Constitution "for now" with a rickety set of checks and balances that'd do for a while .. until a Despot showed up.
He was thinking of "the people" having an ongoing scrutiny and active control to prevent any such slide .. rather than sitting about on their arses, not voting and counting on using guns if it got too bad.
Come on, you can't keep trying to interrupt the intentions of some blokes who have been dead for 200 years.
This isn't 40k.