Comment on deSEC – Free Secure DNSparentComments−teddyh2dYou don’t seem to be giving any up-to-date criticism. I think it’s telling that the old rebuttals still basically stand.−tptacek2dWhich of the criticisms in that article don't stand? What's changed? Adoption of DNSSEC has barely budged since I wrote it.−teddyh1dWhich of the criticisms in that article don't stand? What's changed?Which of the rebuttals in the link I gave don’t stand?Adoption of DNSSEC has barely budged since I wrote it.According to this graph, DNSSEC adoption seems to now be roughly 16×, i.e. 1600%, of what it was when you wrote it:https://www.verisign.com/resources/dnssec-tools/dnssec-score...−tptacek1dSee the comment from 'dsl upthread.As for stats: https://dnssecmenot.fly.dev/It is not surprising that European registrars have added millions of new names nobody is ever going to visit, all of them signed by default at their registrars. That's not meaningful.
Comments
You don’t seem to be giving any up-to-date criticism. I think it’s telling that the old rebuttals still basically stand.
Which of the criticisms in that article don't stand? What's changed? Adoption of DNSSEC has barely budged since I wrote it.
Which of the rebuttals in the link I gave don’t stand?
According to this graph, DNSSEC adoption seems to now be roughly 16×, i.e. 1600%, of what it was when you wrote it:
https://www.verisign.com/resources/dnssec-tools/dnssec-score...
See the comment from 'dsl upthread.
As for stats: https://dnssecmenot.fly.dev/
It is not surprising that European registrars have added millions of new names nobody is ever going to visit, all of them signed by default at their registrars. That's not meaningful.