Skip to content

Comment on San Francisco institution 'heartbroken and furious' after erasure of public artparent

Comments

His point is that "written and vegan agreements" is not the same thing as "has a contract" and that the legal niceties need to be respected or else it would be impossible to get anything done.

Asking "is it cool if I paint your wall?" more than three decades ago doesn't create a contract or protect the work.

I highly doubt that street artists made a legally binding agreement with the owners that protects the art for the simple reason that this would be a ridiculous encumbrance on the property that would be unacceptable to most sane people.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.