I think you're slightly misunderstanding my point, which is that a huge spectrum of associative pattern seeking logics are embedded in language and that the LLM learns them and operates them, approximately.

If this doesn't mean exactly what you claim not to be suggesting, then your meaning is something I find completely incoherent. How can "a logic" be "embedded in language"? If you aren't saying that the LLM picked up something bad from the training data, then what are you suggesting?