Skip to content

Comment on C*: Unifying Programming and Verification in C (2025)parent

Comments

Yeah I dislike it. Why are we babyducking sepples attributes? And what I assume to be namespace accessors? Why are logical assertions enclosed in backticks? I "get it", because it's actually kind of difficult to make a backwards compatible derivative of C that doesn't devolve into glyph soup, but this has a massive frankengrammar stink to it. The proof language is eyebrow raising to say the least.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.