Comment on How Climate Resilient Are the Largest Cities?parentComments−waterthrowaway3dAs a researcher in this general area I would not say 2m by 2100 is a consensus view of the worst case scenario see [1].Here is a useful scenario for understanding what different SLR scenarios mean for the states [2][1] https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/chapter/chapter-4-sea-level-rise-a...[2] https://coast.noaa.gov/slr/("most of the Florida peninsula will be under water in 50-100 years" is certainly not true, however, Miami would be in a very difficult spot at 2m SLR)−RC_ITR3dYour link implies less than 2m, strengthening my point?I said 'even in the most cataclysmic scenarios'−waterthrowaway3dYes, I was agreeing with you. I apologize for being unclear.
Comments
As a researcher in this general area I would not say 2m by 2100 is a consensus view of the worst case scenario see [1].
Here is a useful scenario for understanding what different SLR scenarios mean for the states [2]
[1] https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/chapter/chapter-4-sea-level-rise-a...
[2] https://coast.noaa.gov/slr/
("most of the Florida peninsula will be under water in 50-100 years" is certainly not true, however, Miami would be in a very difficult spot at 2m SLR)
Your link implies less than 2m, strengthening my point?
I said 'even in the most cataclysmic scenarios'
Yes, I was agreeing with you. I apologize for being unclear.