I wouldn't call this a bias. More likely an A/B tested find that (1) algorithmic YouTube video-surfacing with keyword "graph" plus AI related name-dropping was effective, and (2) the already well established journalistic trick of leading with fear to trigger loss-aversion, as "prompting is soon dead" implies some threat of skills-value loss for the reader.
driving engagement to scrape the bottom of our ad-driven engagement dis-attention economy, tragedy of the commons pure.
Comments
I wouldn't call this a bias. More likely an A/B tested find that (1) algorithmic YouTube video-surfacing with keyword "graph" plus AI related name-dropping was effective, and (2) the already well established journalistic trick of leading with fear to trigger loss-aversion, as "prompting is soon dead" implies some threat of skills-value loss for the reader.
driving engagement to scrape the bottom of our ad-driven engagement dis-attention economy, tragedy of the commons pure.
Right. That, and what I wrote simultaneously nearby.
Maybe the common point is "bad incentives".
The one weird trick of reassigning all the income from that contents-stealing to the original posters would I think cover a lot of the realignment.