Skip to content

Comment on Impedance Matching (2017)

Comments

I think concepts from impedance matching could also be loosely applied to other areas, for example:

- How veins in organisms branch out to give "energy" to different areas while being the right size for the required supplies

- How people can adapt and communicate with simpler words but taking more time. The optimum is when both parties are "matched"

- Information theory, data across a channel needs to be sent at a rate lower than its capacity, otherwise it's "rejected"

- In organizations, when a message needs to be passed from one area to another one, each impedance mismatch between individuals can lead to some "information bounce" and make it harder to get a message/idea across

- When politics adopt a measure, there's an impedance mismatch when people aren't fully onboard

It's a bit methaphorical but the overall idea is that efficient transfer across an interface requires compatibility between the source and destination. Incompatibilities produce some sort of "reflections", "distortions" or "backpressure".

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.