Skip to content

Comment on IBM Quantum Nighthawk R2parent

Comments

I agree and I was being facetious since I know the answer is nothing much. The point is that IBM write all this breathless marketing copy that seems detached from the actual utility of the device.

Although I believe there's a difference with the Manhattan project. The original atom bomb was "useful" even at its small scale. Whereas there's likely to be a lot of time between a quantum computer that can factor 69 and a quantum computer that can factor RSA 2048.

IBM write all this breathless marketing copy that seems detached from the actual utility of the device

What are the actual utility according to IBM? Did they say you can order one today on their website? Or even "call us to get the pricing info"? Are there case studies of what their customers use it for? Or only potential uses?

Although I believe there's a difference with the Manhattan project. The original atom bomb was "useful" even at its small scale.

No it was not useful, otherwise it'd have been paraded and hyped up on the media. The trinity test was in July 1945. Hiroshima happened in August. They were practically used as soon as they were deemed ready. Hundreds of thousands people died.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.