Skip to content

Comment on Making a Python interpreter in 1024 bytesparent

Comments

As they say in TDD, write a test, then write the simplest code that will make it pass.

Clearly supporting multiple functions starting with 'p' would be overengineering.

By that standard, this is totally over-engineered. Just hardcode it.

Good idea. Write a python script, and then code the minimal c interpreter possible to make that specific script work, utilizing the script itself as string reference (and any other way one can manage to utilize it in the interpreter itself).

Someone actually testing Kolmogorov Complexity LOL

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.