Skip to content

Comment on US urges G20 countries to allow AI training on creators' work

Comments

At this point perhaps countries should opt out of the Berne Convention [1] and limit copyright to something like 20-30 years after creation.

If you can't recoup your costs after a couple of decades your work either isn't worth anything commercially and/or you are incompetent in business. Regardless of which, society would probably be better served if you were out of the way and the work could be leverage by others.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention

So that will apply to LLMs too? If you cant make a profit out of them after those years releases them under MIT license?

Far from me to defend the AI labs’ absolute disregard for creative work, but that’s not how copyright works.

When copyright expires the work becomes public domain, it doesn’t get a permissive license with restrictions (MIT). Also, expired copyright doesn’t mean you get access to the sources from the creator; when Mickey Mouse becomes public domain you don’t get access to all the original animation cells and drawings, it just means you can draw the character yourself and use its name however you please. Finally, decades-old software doesn’t have the same cultural importance, only a tiny amount of people care.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.