All you’ve said is people with assets certainly couldn’t have earned those assets by earning income prior. Shock horror that people follow basic financial principles and decades later they have some wealth.
Quite the opposite. Whatever they did to earn the income with which they originally bought those assets was 100 times more honest than the relentlessly self-serving politics through which they pumped those assets by creating a living hell for their compatriots.
No, the people with assets are the adjudicators. They investigate themselves and find nothing wrong. An honest process with an honest conclusion, if ever I saw one.
Comments
All you’ve said is people with assets certainly couldn’t have earned those assets by earning income prior. Shock horror that people follow basic financial principles and decades later they have some wealth.
Quite the opposite. Whatever they did to earn the income with which they originally bought those assets was 100 times more honest than the relentlessly self-serving politics through which they pumped those assets by creating a living hell for their compatriots.
Because you’re adjudicator on what’s honest and what’s not right?
No, the people with assets are the adjudicators. They investigate themselves and find nothing wrong. An honest process with an honest conclusion, if ever I saw one.
Bad bot.
No, LLMs would be overkill for arguing with you.