Skip to content

Comment on Banca Etica Suspends A/I's Account While Condemning the Sanctions Behind Itparent

Comments

it seems fairly clear that A/I was providing services to organizations listed as Terrorist Organizations by the US, UK, and Canada

Let's take the UK as example. The organisation mentioned, Palestine Action, was indeed banned under terrorism laws. But on 13 February 2026, the UK High Court has ruled that the ban of Palestine Action under terrorism legislation is unlawful [1]. Why is that ‘fairly clear’ then?

[1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c8x90q9nyzyt

It's still not "fairly clear".

Yep for sure, don't view that as me agreeing with the ruling!

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.